<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: &#8230; eine spektakul&#228;r schwache Form von Gerechtigkeit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/</link>
	<description>Klima-Blog der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Klima der Gerechtigkeit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Merkel zur Klimapolitik</title>
		<link>http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Klima der Gerechtigkeit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Merkel zur Klimapolitik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/#comment-969</guid>
		<description>[...] Deshalb haben wir bis zum n&#228;chsten Jahr alle H&#228;nde voll zu tun. Ein Kyoto-Nachfolgeabkommen soll im Jahr 2009 in D&#228;nemark abgeschlossen werden. Wir m&#252;ssen daf&#252;r Ma&#223;st&#228;be entwickeln. Ich pers&#246;nlich denke, dass es auf lange Frist nur mit bestimmten Pro-Kopf-Emissionen geht. Deshalb m&#252;ssen wir den Austausch neuester Technologien vorantreiben und als Industriel&#228;nder unseren Beitrag dazu leisten. Siehe oben. Bedeutet das Anstreben gleicher Pro-Kopf-Emissionen auf lange Frist auch, dass wir die Emissionsrechte und damit die Anstrengungen auf diesem Weg auch nach diesem Prinzip verteilen? Ich glaube nicht, denn das w&#228;re eine &#8220;extrem schwache Form von Gerechtigkeit&#8221; (Stern). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deshalb haben wir bis zum n&#228;chsten Jahr alle H&#228;nde voll zu tun. Ein Kyoto-Nachfolgeabkommen soll im Jahr 2009 in D&#228;nemark abgeschlossen werden. Wir m&#252;ssen daf&#252;r Ma&#223;st&#228;be entwickeln. Ich pers&#246;nlich denke, dass es auf lange Frist nur mit bestimmten Pro-Kopf-Emissionen geht. Deshalb m&#252;ssen wir den Austausch neuester Technologien vorantreiben und als Industriel&#228;nder unseren Beitrag dazu leisten. Siehe oben. Bedeutet das Anstreben gleicher Pro-Kopf-Emissionen auf lange Frist auch, dass wir die Emissionsrechte und damit die Anstrengungen auf diesem Weg auch nach diesem Prinzip verteilen? Ich glaube nicht, denn das w&#228;re eine &#8220;extrem schwache Form von Gerechtigkeit&#8221; (Stern). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Aubrey Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>There is no equity on a dead planet. Likewise, there is no planet without rates of C&amp;C that are fast enough to: - 

[1] stave off the positive feedback accelerator that we now step onto and [2] subject to requirement one, pre-allocate rationally under that contraction limit at a convergence rate which is an acceleration relative to one but an agreed compromise between those who argue for &#039;slow-late&#039; versus those who argue for &#039;fast-soon&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no equity on a dead planet. Likewise, there is no planet without rates of C&amp;C that are fast enough to: &#8211; </p>
<p>[1] stave off the positive feedback accelerator that we now step onto and [2] subject to requirement one, pre-allocate rationally under that contraction limit at a convergence rate which is an acceleration relative to one but an agreed compromise between those who argue for &#8217;slow-late&#8217; versus those who argue for &#8216;fast-soon&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Jörg Haas</title>
		<link>http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jörg Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Dear Aubrey,
thanks for the nice simulation. It is really very beautiful and instructive. What it amounts to, is very fast contraction to very low levels until 2050, and immediate convergence. Per capita rights now!
I support the general idea and I would like to see a comparison of the GDRs framework with an immediate convergence approach. Probably the GDRs framework would result in more stringent &quot;burdens&quot; to be place on developed countries.
Still, contraction and convergence is still interpreted by many (including Merkel and the Potsdam Memorandum) as amounting to convergence in the long term (e.g. 2050), not immediate convergence. It is there where I would agree with Nick Stern: This is a &quot;spectacularly weak form of equity&quot;. Much better than simple grandfathering, certainly. Maybe the best form of equity we may get. But still spectacularly weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Aubrey,<br />
thanks for the nice simulation. It is really very beautiful and instructive. What it amounts to, is very fast contraction to very low levels until 2050, and immediate convergence. Per capita rights now!<br />
I support the general idea and I would like to see a comparison of the GDRs framework with an immediate convergence approach. Probably the GDRs framework would result in more stringent &#8220;burdens&#8221; to be place on developed countries.<br />
Still, contraction and convergence is still interpreted by many (including Merkel and the Potsdam Memorandum) as amounting to convergence in the long term (e.g. 2050), not immediate convergence. It is there where I would agree with Nick Stern: This is a &#8220;spectacularly weak form of equity&#8221;. Much better than simple grandfathering, certainly. Maybe the best form of equity we may get. But still spectacularly weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Aubrey Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klima-der-gerechtigkeit.de/eine-spektakular-schwache-form-von-gerechtigkeit/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Mr Haas presents Mr Stern as a star critic of &quot;Contraction and Convergence&quot;. 

Haas repeats Stern&#039;s new argument that C&amp;C is a &quot;spectacularly weak form of justice&quot; - indeed citing [what for me is] a spectacularly weak form of C&amp;C. 

Mr Stern is clearly mentally challenged by the issue of accounting climate change mitigation with C&amp;C, as this fundamentally reverses Mr Stern&#039;s opinion of C&amp;C for a third time in one year.

His much vaunted report, dismissed C&amp;C as an &#039;assertion&#039; [not an argument] and then asserted the preposterous viuew that 550 ppmv atmosphere concnetration of CO2 can be achieved for a mere one percent of GDP. [The damages from climate change will overwhelm this account within decades - it is too little too late].

Stern then went on to tell his students that C&amp;C as equal rights was, &quot;too difficult to get your head around&quot;.

He then went on [only weeks ago in Potsdam] and signed the nobel-laureate statement [below] asserting the: -

&quot; Principle of carbon justice, i.e. striving for a long-term convergence to equal-per-capita emissions rights accomplished through a medium-term multi-stage approach accounting for differentiated national capacities.

Mr Stern has been poorly advised and - like Mr Haas and his climate-equity clique - has not done his own homework adequately. 

The C&amp;C calculus is clearly laid out here against the backdrop of the &#039;coupled model&#039; runs from the Hadley Centre now in IPCC AR4: -

www.gci.org.uk/Animations/BENN_C&amp;C_Animation_[Tower_&amp;_Ravens].exe 

This shows the narrowing opportunity we now face and is the basis of any globally numerate response to climate change.

Aubrey Meyer
GCI

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

• Global target such as the 2°C-limit for planetary warming relative to 
pre-industrial levels or the (largely equivalent) halving of worldwide 
greenhouse emissions by 2050. It is useful to view those emissions as 
the product of two crucial factors, namely per capita emissions times 
population. Both of these must be appropriately addressed to attain the 
long-term stabilization target.

• Series of consistent short and medium-term emissions reduction 
targets, essential to drive investment and technology and to minimize 
the need for greater action later.

• Leadership role of industrialized countries, both regarding drastic 
emissions reductions and development of low/no-carbon technologies in 
order to give poor developing countries room for urgently needed 
economic growth within the boundaries of a global carbon regime.

• Principle of carbon justice, i.e. striving for a long-term convergence 
to equal-per-capita emissions rights accomplished through a medium-term 
multi-stage approach accounting for differentiated national capacities.

• Carbon price, as generated, for instance, through an international 
cap-and-trade system (of systems) based on auctioning permits.

• Establishment of a powerful worldwide process supporting 
climate-friendly innovation and cooperation, combined with increased 
funding for RD&amp;D including basic research, to facilitate technology 
transfer and proliferation.

• Major contributions to a multinational funding system for enhancing 
adaptive capacities.

• Scaled-up efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and 
accelerate ecologically appropriate reforestation, achievable through 
the creation of new incentives for communities and countries to preserve 
and even increase their forests.

• Reductions of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions.

Participants
Nobel Laureates

Prof. Zhores Alferov (Nobel Prize in Physics 2000), Russian Academy of 
Sciences &amp; Foundation Alferov, Russia

Prof. Murray Gell-Mann (Nobel Prize in Physics 1969), Santa Fe Institute

Prof. David Gross (Nobel Prize in Physics 2004), University of 
California, Santa Barbara

Prof. Theodor H&#228;nsch (Nobel Prize in Physics 2005), Ludwig Maximilians 
University, Munich

Prof. Alan Heeger (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2000), University of 
California, Santa Barbara

Prof. Sir Antony Hewish (Nobel Prize in Physics 1974), University of 
Cambridge

Prof. Klaus von Klitzing (Nobel Prize in Physics 1985), Max Planck 
Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart

Prof. Walter Kohn (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1998), University of 
California, Santa Barbara

Prof. Wangari Muta Maathai (Nobel Prize in Peace 2004), Green Belt 
Movement

Prof. Rudolph Marcus (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1992), California 
Institute of Technology, Pasadena

Prof. Sir James Mirrlees (Nobel Prize in Economics 1996), University of 
Cambridge and Chinese University, Hong Kong

Prof. Mario Molina (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1995), University of 
California, San Diego (revised)

Prof. Carlo Rubbia (Nobel Prize in Physics 1984), CERN, Geneva

Prof. Amartya Sen (Nobel Prize in Economics 1998), Harvard University

Prof. Sir John Sulston (Nobel Prize in Physiology/ Medicine 2002), 
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge

Contributors

Dr. Angela Merkel, Federal Chancellor

Matthias Platzeck, Minister President of Brandenburg

Sigmar Gabriel, Federal Minister for the Environment, Nature 
Conservation and Nuclear Safety

Dr. Annette Schavan, Federal Minister for Education and Research

Prof. Johanna Wanka, Minister for Science, Research and Culture of the 
State of Brandenburg

Prof. Frieder Meyer-Krahmer, State Secretary, Federal Ministry of 
Education and Research

Prof. Markus Antonietti, Director, Max Planck Institute for Colloid and 
Boundary Layer Research, Potsdam

Prof. Carlo Carraro, Chairman, Department of Economics, University “Ca’ 
Foscari” of Venice

Dr. Peter Frey, editor in chief, Berlin studios of ZDF German television

Prof. Mohamed Hassan, President, African Academy of Sciences and 
Executive Director, Academy of Sciences for the Developing World/ TWAS, 
Trieste

Barbara Hendricks, opera singer, Honorary Ambassador For Life for the 
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Founder of the Barbara 
Hendricks Foundation for Peace and Reconciliation

Prof. Sir Brian Hoskins, Former Head of the Meteorological Department, 
University of Reading 

Prof. Daniel Kammen, Director, Renewable and Appropriate Energy 
Laboratory (RAEL), University of California, Berkeley

Prof. Paul Klemperer, Edgeworth Professor of Economics, Oxford 
University

Jim Leape, Director General, World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland

Prof. Diana Liverman, Director of Oxford University&#039;s Environmental 
Change Institute

Prof. Joachim Luther, Former Director of Fraunhofer Institute for Solar 
Energy Systems (ISE), Advisor to the German Government on research and 
innovation

Ian McEwan, English novelist and Fellow of the Royal Society of 
Literature, Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, and Fellow of the 
American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Prof. Volker ter Meulen, Professor Emeritus, Institute for Virology and 
Immunology, University W&#252;rzburg; President of the German Academy of 
Sciences, Leopoldina, Halle/Saale

Prof. J&#252;rgen Mlynek, President, German Helmholtz Association, Berlin

Prof. Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Professor of Energy Economics at Vienna 
University of Technology

Dr. Sunita Narain, Director, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), 
New Delhi

Prof. Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences 
and International Affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School and the 
Department of Geosciences at Princeton University

Prof. Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel 
on Climate Change); Director General, TERI, New Delhi

Prof. Kirit Parikh, Member, Planning Commission, Government of India, 
New Delhi; Professor Emeritus and Founding Director, Indira Gandhi 
Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Mumbai

Prof. George Poste, Director, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State 
University

Ambassador William C. Ramsay, Deputy Executive Director, International 
Energy Agency, Paris

Prof. Johan Rockstr&#246;m, Director, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)

Dr. Karsten Sach, Director, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature 
Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Berlin

Achim Steiner, Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme 
(UNEP); Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, Nairobi

Prof. Matthias Steinmetz, Director, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam 
(AIP)

Prof. Sir Nicholas Stern, IG Patel Professor and Director, India 
Observatory and Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and 
Political Science

Prof. Klaus T&#246;pfer, Former Executive Director, United Nations 
Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi

Prof. Robert Watson, Chief Scientist and Director for Sustainable 
Development at the World Bank

Prof. Carl Christian von Weizs&#228;cker, Director emeritus of the Institute 
of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne; Max Planck Institute 
for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn

Prof. Ernst Ulrich von Weizs&#228;cker, Dean, Bren School of Environmental 
Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara

Prof. Geoffrey West, President, Santa Fe Institute

Anders Wijkman, Member of the European Parliament; Member of the Royal 
Swedish Academy of Science

Convenor
Prof. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Director, Potsdam Institute for Climate 
Impact Research (PIK); Chief Climate Advisor to the German Government</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Haas presents Mr Stern as a star critic of &#8220;Contraction and Convergence&#8221;. </p>
<p>Haas repeats Stern&#8217;s new argument that C&amp;C is a &#8220;spectacularly weak form of justice&#8221; &#8211; indeed citing [what for me is] a spectacularly weak form of C&amp;C. </p>
<p>Mr Stern is clearly mentally challenged by the issue of accounting climate change mitigation with C&amp;C, as this fundamentally reverses Mr Stern&#8217;s opinion of C&amp;C for a third time in one year.</p>
<p>His much vaunted report, dismissed C&amp;C as an &#8216;assertion&#8217; [not an argument] and then asserted the preposterous viuew that 550 ppmv atmosphere concnetration of CO2 can be achieved for a mere one percent of GDP. [The damages from climate change will overwhelm this account within decades - it is too little too late].</p>
<p>Stern then went on to tell his students that C&amp;C as equal rights was, &#8220;too difficult to get your head around&#8221;.</p>
<p>He then went on [only weeks ago in Potsdam] and signed the nobel-laureate statement [below] asserting the: -</p>
<p>&#8221; Principle of carbon justice, i.e. striving for a long-term convergence to equal-per-capita emissions rights accomplished through a medium-term multi-stage approach accounting for differentiated national capacities.</p>
<p>Mr Stern has been poorly advised and &#8211; like Mr Haas and his climate-equity clique &#8211; has not done his own homework adequately. </p>
<p>The C&amp;C calculus is clearly laid out here against the backdrop of the &#8216;coupled model&#8217; runs from the Hadley Centre now in IPCC AR4: -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gci.org.uk/Animations/BENN_C&#038;C_Animation_Tower_&#038;_Ravens.exe" rel="nofollow">http://www.gci.org.uk/Animations/BENN_C&#038;C_Animation_Tower_&#038;_Ravens.exe</a> </p>
<p>This shows the narrowing opportunity we now face and is the basis of any globally numerate response to climate change.</p>
<p>Aubrey Meyer<br />
GCI</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>• Global target such as the 2°C-limit for planetary warming relative to<br />
pre-industrial levels or the (largely equivalent) halving of worldwide<br />
greenhouse emissions by 2050. It is useful to view those emissions as<br />
the product of two crucial factors, namely per capita emissions times<br />
population. Both of these must be appropriately addressed to attain the<br />
long-term stabilization target.</p>
<p>• Series of consistent short and medium-term emissions reduction<br />
targets, essential to drive investment and technology and to minimize<br />
the need for greater action later.</p>
<p>• Leadership role of industrialized countries, both regarding drastic<br />
emissions reductions and development of low/no-carbon technologies in<br />
order to give poor developing countries room for urgently needed<br />
economic growth within the boundaries of a global carbon regime.</p>
<p>• Principle of carbon justice, i.e. striving for a long-term convergence<br />
to equal-per-capita emissions rights accomplished through a medium-term<br />
multi-stage approach accounting for differentiated national capacities.</p>
<p>• Carbon price, as generated, for instance, through an international<br />
cap-and-trade system (of systems) based on auctioning permits.</p>
<p>• Establishment of a powerful worldwide process supporting<br />
climate-friendly innovation and cooperation, combined with increased<br />
funding for RD&amp;D including basic research, to facilitate technology<br />
transfer and proliferation.</p>
<p>• Major contributions to a multinational funding system for enhancing<br />
adaptive capacities.</p>
<p>• Scaled-up efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and<br />
accelerate ecologically appropriate reforestation, achievable through<br />
the creation of new incentives for communities and countries to preserve<br />
and even increase their forests.</p>
<p>• Reductions of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Participants<br />
Nobel Laureates</p>
<p>Prof. Zhores Alferov (Nobel Prize in Physics 2000), Russian Academy of<br />
Sciences &amp; Foundation Alferov, Russia</p>
<p>Prof. Murray Gell-Mann (Nobel Prize in Physics 1969), Santa Fe Institute</p>
<p>Prof. David Gross (Nobel Prize in Physics 2004), University of<br />
California, Santa Barbara</p>
<p>Prof. Theodor H&#228;nsch (Nobel Prize in Physics 2005), Ludwig Maximilians<br />
University, Munich</p>
<p>Prof. Alan Heeger (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2000), University of<br />
California, Santa Barbara</p>
<p>Prof. Sir Antony Hewish (Nobel Prize in Physics 1974), University of<br />
Cambridge</p>
<p>Prof. Klaus von Klitzing (Nobel Prize in Physics 1985), Max Planck<br />
Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart</p>
<p>Prof. Walter Kohn (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1998), University of<br />
California, Santa Barbara</p>
<p>Prof. Wangari Muta Maathai (Nobel Prize in Peace 2004), Green Belt<br />
Movement</p>
<p>Prof. Rudolph Marcus (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1992), California<br />
Institute of Technology, Pasadena</p>
<p>Prof. Sir James Mirrlees (Nobel Prize in Economics 1996), University of<br />
Cambridge and Chinese University, Hong Kong</p>
<p>Prof. Mario Molina (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1995), University of<br />
California, San Diego (revised)</p>
<p>Prof. Carlo Rubbia (Nobel Prize in Physics 1984), CERN, Geneva</p>
<p>Prof. Amartya Sen (Nobel Prize in Economics 1998), Harvard University</p>
<p>Prof. Sir John Sulston (Nobel Prize in Physiology/ Medicine 2002),<br />
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge</p>
<p>Contributors</p>
<p>Dr. Angela Merkel, Federal Chancellor</p>
<p>Matthias Platzeck, Minister President of Brandenburg</p>
<p>Sigmar Gabriel, Federal Minister for the Environment, Nature<br />
Conservation and Nuclear Safety</p>
<p>Dr. Annette Schavan, Federal Minister for Education and Research</p>
<p>Prof. Johanna Wanka, Minister for Science, Research and Culture of the<br />
State of Brandenburg</p>
<p>Prof. Frieder Meyer-Krahmer, State Secretary, Federal Ministry of<br />
Education and Research</p>
<p>Prof. Markus Antonietti, Director, Max Planck Institute for Colloid and<br />
Boundary Layer Research, Potsdam</p>
<p>Prof. Carlo Carraro, Chairman, Department of Economics, University “Ca’<br />
Foscari” of Venice</p>
<p>Dr. Peter Frey, editor in chief, Berlin studios of ZDF German television</p>
<p>Prof. Mohamed Hassan, President, African Academy of Sciences and<br />
Executive Director, Academy of Sciences for the Developing World/ TWAS,<br />
Trieste</p>
<p>Barbara Hendricks, opera singer, Honorary Ambassador For Life for the<br />
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Founder of the Barbara<br />
Hendricks Foundation for Peace and Reconciliation</p>
<p>Prof. Sir Brian Hoskins, Former Head of the Meteorological Department,<br />
University of Reading </p>
<p>Prof. Daniel Kammen, Director, Renewable and Appropriate Energy<br />
Laboratory (RAEL), University of California, Berkeley</p>
<p>Prof. Paul Klemperer, Edgeworth Professor of Economics, Oxford<br />
University</p>
<p>Jim Leape, Director General, World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland</p>
<p>Prof. Diana Liverman, Director of Oxford University&#8217;s Environmental<br />
Change Institute</p>
<p>Prof. Joachim Luther, Former Director of Fraunhofer Institute for Solar<br />
Energy Systems (ISE), Advisor to the German Government on research and<br />
innovation</p>
<p>Ian McEwan, English novelist and Fellow of the Royal Society of<br />
Literature, Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, and Fellow of the<br />
American Academy of Arts and Sciences</p>
<p>Prof. Volker ter Meulen, Professor Emeritus, Institute for Virology and<br />
Immunology, University W&#252;rzburg; President of the German Academy of<br />
Sciences, Leopoldina, Halle/Saale</p>
<p>Prof. J&#252;rgen Mlynek, President, German Helmholtz Association, Berlin</p>
<p>Prof. Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Professor of Energy Economics at Vienna<br />
University of Technology</p>
<p>Dr. Sunita Narain, Director, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE),<br />
New Delhi</p>
<p>Prof. Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences<br />
and International Affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School and the<br />
Department of Geosciences at Princeton University</p>
<p>Prof. Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel<br />
on Climate Change); Director General, TERI, New Delhi</p>
<p>Prof. Kirit Parikh, Member, Planning Commission, Government of India,<br />
New Delhi; Professor Emeritus and Founding Director, Indira Gandhi<br />
Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Mumbai</p>
<p>Prof. George Poste, Director, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State<br />
University</p>
<p>Ambassador William C. Ramsay, Deputy Executive Director, International<br />
Energy Agency, Paris</p>
<p>Prof. Johan Rockstr&#246;m, Director, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)</p>
<p>Dr. Karsten Sach, Director, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature<br />
Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Berlin</p>
<p>Achim Steiner, Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme<br />
(UNEP); Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, Nairobi</p>
<p>Prof. Matthias Steinmetz, Director, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam<br />
(AIP)</p>
<p>Prof. Sir Nicholas Stern, IG Patel Professor and Director, India<br />
Observatory and Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and<br />
Political Science</p>
<p>Prof. Klaus T&#246;pfer, Former Executive Director, United Nations<br />
Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi</p>
<p>Prof. Robert Watson, Chief Scientist and Director for Sustainable<br />
Development at the World Bank</p>
<p>Prof. Carl Christian von Weizs&#228;cker, Director emeritus of the Institute<br />
of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne; Max Planck Institute<br />
for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn</p>
<p>Prof. Ernst Ulrich von Weizs&#228;cker, Dean, Bren School of Environmental<br />
Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara</p>
<p>Prof. Geoffrey West, President, Santa Fe Institute</p>
<p>Anders Wijkman, Member of the European Parliament; Member of the Royal<br />
Swedish Academy of Science</p>
<p>Convenor<br />
Prof. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Director, Potsdam Institute for Climate<br />
Impact Research (PIK); Chief Climate Advisor to the German Government</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
